🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."